Redundancy Redefined: What Employers Need to Know About Redeployment

Posted on September 2025 By Speller International
Untitled Design (7)
In August 2025, the High Court of Australia handed down a landmark decision that reshapes how employers must approach redundancy. The ruling in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley has broadened the scope of what constitutes “reasonable redeployment” under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)and its implications will be felt across every industry.

So, what does this mean for your business, your workforce strategy, and your engagement with contractors?

What Changed?

Traditionally, redeployment obligations were interpreted narrowly focused on whether there was a vacant role an employee could be moved into. The High Court has now clarified that:

  • No vacancy is required: Employers may need to consider redeployment even if it means adjusting existing workforce structures.

  • Contractor roles are in scope: Roles currently filled by contractors may be considered potential redeployment opportunities for employees facing redundancy.

  • Broader considerations apply: Factors such as employee skills, training, business needs, upcoming retirements, parental leave, and workforce models must all be assessed.

In short, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) can now ask: Could the business have restructured, insourced, or reallocated work to reasonably redeploy an employee?

What This Means for Employers

This decision significantly raises the bar for employers planning restructures or redundancies:

  • Stronger employee protections: Redundancies may be challenged as “not genuine” if redeployment into contractor or other roles was not considered.

  • Greater documentation required: Employers must be able to demonstrate that all redeployment options including restructuring were explored and fairly assessed.

  • Strategic workforce planning: Contractor utilisation, succession planning, and role design will all come under closer scrutiny.

Impact on Different Workforce Groups

Permanent Employees

  • Stronger rights to contest redundancies.

  • Increased chances of being redeployed into contractor held or adjusted roles.

Contractors

  • Roles may now be considered redeployment opportunities for permanent staff.

  • Greater justification required for continued contractor use.

Key Takeaway

Redundancy in Australia has been redefined. The focus has shifted from vacancy driven redeployment to a much broader obligation that considers the entire workforce structure, including contractor arrangements. Employers must adapt quickly or risk facing costly legal challenges.